Quality assurance

Peer Review Process

A fair, confidential, and constructive evaluation process designed to strengthen scholarly work and protect research quality.

Editorial standard

Independent assessment based on scholarly merit

Every eligible manuscript is evaluated for originality, relevance, methodological quality, clarity, ethical compliance, and contribution to the field. Editorial decisions remain independent of commercial or personal influence.

From Submission to Decision

  1. 01
    Initial Screening

    The editorial office checks scope, completeness, originality, presentation, and basic ethical requirements.

  2. 02
    Editor Assessment

    An editor evaluates scholarly fit and selects qualified independent reviewers with relevant expertise.

  3. 03
    Peer Review

    Reviewers assess the manuscript confidentially and provide evidence-based recommendations.

  4. 04
    Author Revision

    Authors respond to comments clearly and revise the manuscript where appropriate.

  5. 05
    Editorial Decision

    The editor considers the reports, revisions, and journal standards before reaching a decision.

A

Confidentiality

Manuscripts and review correspondence are treated as confidential editorial material.

B

Conflicts of Interest

Editors and reviewers must disclose relationships that could affect impartial assessment.

C

Constructive Review

Reports should be specific, respectful, evidence-based, and focused on improving the work.

D

Editorial Independence

Acceptance decisions are based on the manuscript’s merit and relevance to the journal.